Elusive expecting couple spotted lingerie shopping
Heath Ledger and Michelle Williams, who are pulling a Christy Turlington by not announcing any pregnancy although she is obviously showing, were spotted buying lingerie at Linda’s in SoHo, according to this article at Page Six. Heath was "rubbing [Michelle's] belly and kissing her neck" in the dressing room.
Post a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the site staff has approved them.
The following types of comments will not be posted:
- namecalling.
- any type of discrimination.
- explicit sexual references.
- advertising and spam.
- off-topic and completely unrelated to the post.
We are cautious about discussions on volatile topics such as abortion, religion, politics and race.
If you have questions, concerns, or breaking news to share, please contact us at CBBTips@gmail.com rather than posting a comment.
Feel free to agree or disagree with each other as long as you do it respectfully, remembering that we all have our own experiences and perspectives. Keep in mind that there are people on the other end reading what you write.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.
June 7th, 2005 at 9:44 am
Where are the pics? Why are there NEVER any pics of the two of them?
June 7th, 2005 at 12:41 pm
I agree – how is she SO obviously showing? Has anyone even seen her?
June 7th, 2005 at 3:55 pm
Is this the Michelle from Destiny’s Child??? Anyone know?
June 7th, 2005 at 4:25 pm
No its not that Michelle, its the Michelle from Dawson’s Creek.
June 7th, 2005 at 4:25 pm
No, this is the girl who played Jen on Dawson’s Creek.
June 7th, 2005 at 7:27 pm
haha…That would be a sight…Heath and Michelle from Destiny’s Child! For some reason I don’t think they would be a good match..lol
I can say I am jealous of Michelle! Heath is one fine looking man!
June 7th, 2005 at 7:55 pm
It has been said by both People and Page Six, in this sighting, and the one in People last week at a cafe, that she has an obviously pregnant belly.
There are not usually pics of them because they have lived in Australia for the past year-they are in LA and NYC now while Heath is promoting his new movie, and possibly for the birth of the baby. However, Vanessa, it’s not like there’s NEVER pics of them. There’s 4 or 5-we have one under ‘pregnancy photos’ that was taken about a month and a half ago. If there were photos from the lingerie shopping, we would post them. However, for now, all we have is this information.
June 7th, 2005 at 10:32 pm
Yeah, they posted some nice photos in April, I think, early belly, but definitely distinguishable as baby belly. And I saw one in a magazine in May. CBB does excellent work, so let’s be nice.
June 7th, 2005 at 10:38 pm
I was not posting that as something against CBB. I’m just saying I’ve not seen any pictures anywhere that are really convincing to me that she is expecting. I don’t read magazines often so I guess I should see if I can find old people mags to look for it. Sorry if it seemed I was speaking against CBB
June 7th, 2005 at 10:59 pm
I think it was an early May People, Vanessa, it was shortly after the pic posted here near Apple & Gwyneth on April 21, and she was a tiny bit bigger than this photo, saw it when my daughter was at the dentist either April 29 or May 6. They were posing for this one,smiling, not saying they were expecting but not denying either, & not just a paparazzi shot. Saw another in Us or another publication, but wasn’t easy to say in that one. One of them was in something discussing Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, a “Dawson’s Creek” sidebar. I’ve heard October, and I think that was in People too. Do you love seeing all the celeb babies? It’s fun, and refreshing that Sarah and Danielle do their best to keep things on a positive note.
June 7th, 2005 at 11:42 pm
I didn’t think you were Vanessa! Just wanted to point out that their are pics of the floating around the net, they’re just few and far between!
Thank you for the compliments, Patti.
June 7th, 2005 at 11:45 pm
http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2005/04/pregnant_michel.html
There’s the pic we’re all talking about!
June 8th, 2005 at 11:06 am
I definitely believe that M&H are pregnant. If they were not, their publicists or agents would have denied it by now.
June 8th, 2005 at 8:29 pm
Does anyone know of a link I could see the people pics?
June 8th, 2005 at 10:02 pm
That is the picture (the link I posted). People and Us Weekly ran the same one.
June 8th, 2005 at 10:33 pm
Oh okay. I thought there were other ones that were being said. Thanks. I wonder if she went with him to the Lords of Dogtown premiere.
June 8th, 2005 at 10:40 pm
She didn’t, unfortunately. And I think the press were told not to ask questions, because when he was on Jay Leno, they never asked him about it.
June 8th, 2005 at 11:11 pm
I saw at least one other photo, but I don’t remember where. She had a white shirt, slightly bigger than this photo, and easier to tell it was a bump. It was in a multi photo layout like they do in the front of People, but it was someone else. But it was a magazine, because I refuse to read the Tabloids that have been known to take “creative license” with their photos and stories.
June 9th, 2005 at 4:40 am
im sure heath and michelle will make a really good mummy and daddy they seem so in love and happy
June 9th, 2005 at 11:04 pm
patti, when did you saw that other photo?
June 9th, 2005 at 11:46 pm
marina- a week or two after this one, this one was posted April 21 I think, and I was reading the other at my daughter’s oral surgeon either Fri April 29 or May 6, while I was waiting for them to finish. It was a current issue, I wish I could remember which publication, it’s driving me nuts! I even looked when we went to get her retainer adjusted, but they’d changed their magazines to the June issues! I do know they usually have People, Us, In Touch, and as I said, it was the newest issue at that time.