<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise at memorial service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celebrity-babies.com/2006/02/18/katie_holmes_an-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2006/02/18/katie_holmes_an-5/</link>
	<description>Celebrating the lifestyle of Hollywood&#039;s newest moms and littlest stars.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2006/02/18/katie_holmes_an-5/#comment-180091</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 00:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2006/02/18/katie_holmes_an-5#comment-180091</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well Tom and Katie got engaged on June 17 last year, so im presuming (personal opinion) that they got engaged because she was pregnant. If this is so, her due date could be as early as late february, but if they concieved after the engagement, her due date would be in March. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There were pictures of the two also, in the Sydney Morning Herald today. Tom was shirtless and Katie was in a loose singlet. They had just been swimming, but unfortunatley there were no pictures of her bump (at least not in the paper).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Well Tom and Katie got engaged on June 17 last year, so im presuming (personal opinion) that they got engaged because she was pregnant. If this is so, her due date could be as early as late february, but if they concieved after the engagement, her due date would be in March. </p>
<p>There were pictures of the two also, in the Sydney Morning Herald today. Tom was shirtless and Katie was in a loose singlet. They had just been swimming, but unfortunatley there were no pictures of her bump (at least not in the paper).</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah CBB Editor</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2006/02/18/katie_holmes_an-5/#comment-180094</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah CBB Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2006/02/18/katie_holmes_an-5#comment-180094</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I wish they would tell us! I&#039;ve heard about the third week of March, but that&#039;s just gossip.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I wish they would tell us! I&#8217;ve heard about the third week of March, but that&#8217;s just gossip.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ally</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2006/02/18/katie_holmes_an-5/#comment-180098</link>
		<dc:creator>ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2006/02/18/katie_holmes_an-5#comment-180098</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Wow, she is really towering over him in the second pic.  When is she due?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Wow, she is really towering over him in the second pic.  When is she due?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
