yes if you click here http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2006/02/index.html then scroll almost to the bottom theres a pic of her belly taken in february.

Wasn’t there a photo awhile back of Katie holding Starbuck’s cups, her shirt flew up and revealed her real pregnant-looking tummy (flesh and all!)? It was posted on CB Blog a long time ago…anyone remember that? That was the only thing that helped me believe it was real back then…

nicksmomma: I get exactly what you are saying and I totally agree!

Oh, and this is my two cents on what people are saying about them parading their courtship and engagement to the world…you are right, they did! So much at times, I felt ill. But a child is much different than a new relationship or even an engagement. They were flauting like it was no tomorrow, but maybe this area of their life they want to have to themselves for awhile…I know I did. And I know I am not a celebrity, but think about it, people put their engagement and wedding announcements in the papers and stuff (we did) and when our son was born the hospital put it in the paper (this is a small area and they do that with all births-but no picture) but for our engagement and wedding we put a picture of ourselves in it. Not of our son, that was something private, I guess you could almost say sacred to us. Is this making sense to anyone? I hope so, because I know exactly what I want to say and am trying to say, so I hope it is coming out that way…lol

Oh my gosh, I have never in my life! I cannot believe some of the stuff being said on here. I agree with the person that posted that said everyone complained when they first got together and they were in all the mags, now they are out of the spotlight and just to have something to do, people are “speculating” that Suri doesnt exist or has a birth defect or died. This is awful. I doubt it, but just think if Katie was reading some of this stuff…I know personally, it would make me not take my child out now for sure. Why? Just to prove to everyone “Look, she is real, see, here she is!” No way! But see, now they are in a damned if they do and damned if they don’t situation. They have kept the privacy that they are entitled to, and are being put down for that, and now when they do show Suri, everyone will just say that it isn’t really their baby, or that they had to wait for the “adoption” of a baby to fit Suri’s age went through. It is so sad…this is similar to the same thing that Britney went through…after awhile every single little thing she did was pointed out and critisized, now she has went off the radar for a bit, and everyone needs someone new to go after…
Like I said before, I know if I were Katie, with all the “speculation” going on as to whether or not my child was real or not, I would say “Screw it, I am in no hurry now to show them for sure” and make sure no one saw her. This is just ridiculous in my opinion

If people in Toledo have seen Suri, why haven’t the papparazzi? I don’t buy that for a second.

maybe she has really bad cradle cap?

People in Toledo have seen Katie out with Suri, when Tom was in China promoting a movie. She was also reportedly looking for a house there.

Yes. I’ve seen that photo many times before. The children look to be more toddler aged as opposed to young infants.

Besides these 3 photos, I can’t really think of any others that were seen until they were quite a bit older…

Some people don’t want to acknowledge that the Kidman-Cruise children were rarely photographed when they were young because it doesn’t really help support the conspiracy rumors.

The whole thing is getting ridiculous!

Here’s another photo you can check out:

http://www.aftonbladet.se/kvinna/0008/03/tom.jpg