Katie Couric on her unexpected breakfast interruption and more
by CBB correspondent Joyce:
Katie Couric has said one of the incentives for her to accept the anchor position at CBS Evening News was being able to have breakfast with her daughters, Ellie, 15, and Carrie, 12, after having missed out on it during her 15-year tenure at Today. However, she tells Reader’s Digest that someone else is missing from the breakfast table nowadays – Ellie, who spends the morning straightening her hair.
"Sometimes it’s just cereal, but it is fun to be with them and have a bit more of a normal routine. But it is not quite as richly fulfilling as maybe I had imagined. They are rushing around. Ellie, who is 15, spends most of her morning flat-ironing her hair, so I don’t get to see her as much as I’d like. I usually take her food to her room because it’s an involved process, that flat-ironing business."
The girls do wait for Katie, 50, to come home for dinner, though, because she feels it’s important for the family to have dinner together, "even if it’s just talking about the brown rice that’s overcooked."
While it cuts into their meals and time together, her daughters are proud of what their mother has accomplished in her career. Carrie selected Katie for a school project in which she had to interview someone who is making a difference in the world. "She said, ‘My mom has shown that a woman can do anything a man can do and that, when you’re faced with obstacles, if you put your mind to it, you can overcome them.’ "
Katie, who lost her husband Jay Monahan to colon cancer in 1998, also discusses the hardships of being a single parent, particularly noting the "grossly insensitive" father-daughter nights at school. She reveals in the Q & A that she would love for her daughters to have two parents, but would never rush into a relationship just to give them a father figure.
Ellie and Carrie do have someone else to lean on in their home – their nanny, Lori Beth, who Katie credits with helping her balance her career and her family. So important is she to them that Katie is extending an invitation to Lori Beth’s husband to move into their home when she gets married. "Otherwise, I would miss her horribly. The girls would too."
Source: Reader’s Digest
- Posted on Jan 25, 07 at 11:00AM
- Permalink
- 12 Comments
January 25th, 2007 at 1:20 pm
Hmmm, that’s interesting. While I can see that their nanny is obviously a loving, integral part of their family, it will be interesting to see if nanny’s hubby will want to join the slumber party too. Maybe they will luck out and he will! Who’s to say? I love Katie and wish her all the best.
January 25th, 2007 at 1:25 pm
I think it’s unfair of her to say ‘father-daughter’ events are so grossly insensitive. It is sad that her girls lost their father, but the father-daughter bond is a special one and others shouldn’t feel bad about celebrating it. As painful as it may be her girls can skip that event while respecting the other girls’ right to enjoy it.
Growing up I had a friend whose father was accidentaly shot and a friend whose mother died of cancer. I can remember feeling guilty for having both my parents and wouldn’t show them affection in front of these girls in case it hurt them. Now I realise that we can be sensitive, of course, but you shouldn’t begrudge those who have not lost their parent or spouse.
If Katie’s husband were alive I am sure she would want to celebrate his role in their lives and not refrain because of all of the people who have lost. Or else Father’s Day, etc. are all ‘grossly insensitive’ too?
January 25th, 2007 at 2:49 pm
I’m sorry some find father/daughter nights insensitive, especially grossly so. I was raised by just my mom, and hey, it does happen…I never begrudged my friends time with their fathers. Would I have liked a father’s involvement in my life? Certainly. But we’re not all the same. I’m sure there are plenty of activities that everyone can be involved in. I never really saw myself as lacking. I wonder if Katie and her daughters do anything everyone else might not be able to participate in. There are many reasons why kids can’t be a part of activites in school. I wonder if all those activities are also grossly insensitive? I dislike it that all the papers I sign for my children come addressed to legal guardian rather than parent. But the word parent is apparently considered insensitive to some, too.
January 25th, 2007 at 5:01 pm
I am a teacher, and we have Doughnuts with Dad and Muffins with Mom each year. I am always sure to specify that they are free to bring their father or any other male relative (and vice versa). I don’t think it’s insensitive to try and get parent’s involved in their children’s education.
January 25th, 2007 at 7:17 pm
Jen,
I also teach and we have Donuts with Dad and Muffins with Mom, but we let our kiddos know too that grandpap/grandma, aunt/uncle or special friend are always welcome.
I really admire Katie and think she is a wonderful woman/mother, but I didn’t care for her comment about the events begin “grossly incensitive.”, but again we are all entitled to our opinion!!
January 25th, 2007 at 8:09 pm
hear, hear! if u can’t take ur dad, take an uncle or grandpa or godfather or whoever. i am single and i think valentine’s day is a rort coz basically ppl who r in love get presents and flowers and chocolates n stuff n i don’t get anything. i am technically allergic to tons of foods so when i was little i got left out of lots of food-related activities at and away from school also.
January 25th, 2007 at 8:28 pm
I agree, I don’t think it’s “Grossly Insensitive”. I think if you have a father to go to the event, good for you. If you don’t, that’s okay too.
January 26th, 2007 at 3:43 am
I think it’s great that Katie acknowledges how important the girls’ nanny is to all of them. There are so many celebrities out there whose children are almost exclusively raised by nannies and they never publicly express one word of thanks. I like that Katie doesn’t hide the fact that she has a nanny, and is truly appreciative of the work she does…….
January 26th, 2007 at 8:14 am
I agree with Katie. My son’s school has donuts for Dads and my sons 2nd grade teached took him 2 years in a row. Although he was grateful for the offer, he felt out of place and embarrassed that everyone knew his dad wasn’t there. He had other kids ask him where his Dad was and he didn’t know what to say. Any event, that singles out a specific parent, grandparent, etc. is “grossly insensitive” just as Katie says. Furthermore, my sons had a project about their family tree and history and were quizzed about what their relatives did for a living, etc. My son (God Bless Him) got up in front of the class and told everyone that his grandfather was in prison and that he doesn’t know what his father does because he doesn’t call. Then, the school calls me at work to tell me they have a problem with what he said and that it was very uncomfortable, never thinking for one minute that they have no business putting children in a position of having to talk about painful family situations. I told the school they owed him an apology and that I would never make my son feel embarrased or ashamed for the behavior of his father, grandfather or anyone else. It’s ignorant to think that all kids come from happy, 2 parent families. The majority of families deal with issues like death, divorce, disfunction, etc. To create a situation where any child who doesn’t have a “normal” family is singled out is irresponsible, and cruel. There is absolutley no need for it and it amazes me that the schools continue to sponsor these types of events. How about “Family Breakfast” or “Breakfast with your Hero” where you child can invite someone they admire? I know this post was long, and I apologize for rambling on, but I completely understand how Katie and her kids feel…
January 26th, 2007 at 1:20 pm
At my daughter’s school, they have a father-daughter dance in the Spring. Although she has a two-parent home, it still rubs me the wrong way. I do think it is a bit insensitive, as there are many little girls out there without dads. Why make it harder than it already is? They should just have a social event that includes everyone. I don’t think Katie is wrong for saying so.
January 26th, 2007 at 11:48 pm
My husband’s father died when he was very young. His uncle took him and his brothers to the annual Father-Son breakfast at school. Does Katie not have a male relative or family friend that would enjoy taking the girls? Her father, her brother, or one of her brothers-in-law? She could take them herself, too. Goodness, even my husband’s mother went to some events, and no one even batted an eye that she was there.
My school didn’t have parent-child nights: either father-daughter, father-son, mother-daughter, or mother-son. Katie could think about changing schools, too.
I don’t think father-daughter or father-son events or mother-daughter and mother-son events are any more “grossly insensitive” than baby showers are to infertile women or bridal showers are to single women.
There are many life situations that are sad, painful, unpleasant, and beyond our control, but I wouldn’t tell others to hide their joy because of my own pain, and I wouldn’t want them to.
In addition, my husband’s mother died when he was 21. He has been without living parents for nearly 17 years now – most of his adult life, and almost as long as he had living parents. Yet, he doesn’t find it painful or insensitive of me to send a Mother’s Day card to my mum, or a Father’s Day card to my dad (which he enjoys choosing and is happy to sign). But he may be in a different place in his grief journey than Katie.
How does Katie feel about the Mother-Daughter events? She only mentions the father-daughter night. Does she eschew the mother-daughter events out of sensitivity to those who no longer have their mothers?
June 9th, 2008 at 11:12 am
carrie monahan goes to my school she’s in my class