Katie Price poses nude with husband; talks about her kids
Brit star Katie ‘Jordan’ Price, 29, and her husband Peter Andre were recently photographed with a nude Katie perched on Peter’s lap. Katie, who’s expecting their third child in the next few weeks, has had to cancel the remainder of her book signings due to exhaustion, but earlier this week had time to talk to Channel 4’s Paul O’Grady about the pregnancy and her boys — Harvey, 5, and Junior, 2 this month.
On her pregnancy: Katie said she ‘can’t wait to meet her little princess’ and that she ‘just wants her out now.’ Katie made it sound like her due date had been Sunday, the 10th, but we had heard the first week of July.
On Harvey’s mirror accident: Katie explains that the accident occurred when a new mirror, installed in the house four days prior, fell off the wall and onto Harvey, with no provocation from him. Harvey suffered a broken nose and a deep cut on his face that required four stitches.
Taking time off: Katie will be taking 8 weeks off after the birth of her daughter.
Source: The Sun
Thanks to CBB readers Kitty, Lost Girl and Vicky.
Please note that while the photo is tasteful, Katie is nude, so you may not want to click if you’re at work.
Click below to view.
- Posted on Jun 12, 07 at 11:51PM
- Permalink
- 51 Comments
June 13th, 2007 at 12:20 am
Shes looks so comfortable in her skin, so happy to be welcoming a daughter! I hope all the accidents and bad luck her family has been having is gone so that she can enjoy this wonderful time in her life!
June 13th, 2007 at 12:24 am
They look really photoshopped. Like … not real people.
June 13th, 2007 at 12:39 am
That might be lovely, if she didn’t look like she got shot in the face with a makeup gun, a la The Simpsons. I’d love to see this photo with her wearing no makeup and without the teased hair.
June 13th, 2007 at 12:53 am
Jessie- IMO, I think that was kind of a mean thing to say. Don’t get me wrong, I DO think that Katie wears way too much make-up and sometimes (although not so much in this picture) resembles a barbie doll. Therefore, I agree that she DOES look a little fake in this picture. However, that doesn’t mean that the people in the picture are actually digitally created versions of Katie and Peter.
Also, the picture probably WAS PhotoShopped at least a little bit, as nearly all professional photos of celebs are. However, I highly doubt that the entire thing was digitally created. If it were, the Sun or whoever took the photo (I am unsure whether the Sun takes photos themselves, or if they have someone else do it), would probably risk getting into serious legal trouble with Katie, Peter, and/or their reps (if they have reps).
June 13th, 2007 at 12:57 am
Oh dear, they look like they are made of wax in the photo. Sometimes photo editing is carried too far.
June 13th, 2007 at 1:36 am
to Annoynomus – photoshopped doesn’t mean digitaly created, but exactly what you said: touched up a little bit. and if there’s too much photoshop people end up looking like they’re animated, so fake. i’m pretty sure jessie wasn’t implying that someone created this picture out of nothing.
i think if katie wore less make up she would be stunning. it’s distracting and it doesn’t make her look any better. other than that it’s a cute photo something nice to have to remind her of her pregnancy.
June 13th, 2007 at 2:15 am
I didn’t mean I thought it was digitally created. Just that it looks like it’s been touched up so much that they don’t even look like themselves. Their skin has been smoothed out far beyond what a normal persons would be — like Kresta said, they look like wax figures. I’m sure it’s a real picture of them that’s just been touched up, but it’s a bit extreme IMO.
June 13th, 2007 at 5:51 am
I think they look fab, but then i think there fab anyway so i am bias lol
June 13th, 2007 at 7:55 am
They totally airbrushed Katie’s butt out of that picture, nobody’s rear end is at a right-angle!!
June 13th, 2007 at 8:16 am
After getting over the initial shock of the photo, I see now what you mean about it looking “fake” or over edited.
Katie’s face looks like modeling shoot from Vogue or something, while her body is unrealistically too smooth and obviously Photoshopped. If you look, she has no natural creases between her thigh and belly or at the top of her leg, none by her knee, none under her breast, or anywhere for that matter, which makes her especially look unnatural.
Peter’s face and hands are perfectly smooth as well, which gives him a slightly unnatural look as well.
June 13th, 2007 at 8:34 am
i think they are a beautiful couple and Katie photographs so great! I am sure there is a bit of photoshopping going on…but ALL celebs are photoshopped. None of them are perfect enough to go without. I am really happy for them…finally having the baby girl they wanted.
June 13th, 2007 at 8:59 am
While there are many people (Victoria Beckham heading the queue perhaps?) who are very quick to castigate these two, it’s often overlooked that Kate is a canny and astute businesswoman and entirely self-made multi-millionairess, she has raised a physically disabled child single-handedly whilst his biological father has hardly featured, she has turned her hand to writing and singing with more than a little success, she has a happy and fulfilling marriage to a man she adores and who worships her in return. She is tough, uncompromising, answers to no-one and neither seeks nor needs anyone’s approval.
So ladies, about this criticism of her wearing too much lipstick……
June 13th, 2007 at 9:04 am
Um ok, is it just me or does he look creepy. Hes like “yeah i tapped this and now look, great”
She looks so disturbing it sick. I really think these people need a does of reality. I really am getting sick of the rich!
June 13th, 2007 at 9:32 am
Peter looks fab.Katie looks great!
June 13th, 2007 at 9:44 am
Are you sure this isn’t a wax statue of them?lol I think both are very beautiful looking people but this photo is definitely not flattering of either one of them. It is also very misproportionate. JMO
June 13th, 2007 at 9:55 am
I don’t think she looks that airbrushed. I can see the blochiness on her skin(which we all have) and she always were’s alot of makeup. Why would her photoshoots be any different??
Also, I think if the editors were to go too far with the photoshop…they would have added an @ss to Katie…there is none!
June 13th, 2007 at 10:23 am
I think she looks a little small for 8 months along. On other sites I have even heard nine months along and due any day. She is having a small baby I think.
I am not into seeing women who have so much fake about them. Fake boobs, too much plastic surgery and usually really bad clothes make this woman, who seems to be famous for no reason, really unattractive to me.
June 13th, 2007 at 10:24 am
I think it’s a wonderful thing to be so comfortable in one’s own body…. But I agree there’s something “off” about the picture. Not sure what, though. I don’t know anything about this couple other than I see updates on cbb. That’s it! LOL! But good for them, and I sure hope the accidents stop with their little guy!
June 13th, 2007 at 10:31 am
I don’t like this picture at all. Her face & hair are WAY too made up, don’t like her expression either and he looks like he’s either trying to seduce the camera or getting ready to fight. I think if they would’ve went for a nice natural picture, it would’ve been amazing. I love the idea for the picture but they are too posey/intense for this picture. Should’ve focused on the baby & the beauty of that, not a glamour photo opt to overexpose themselves.
June 13th, 2007 at 10:41 am
She is really beautiful without makeup. I think she looks better without it! I guess that’s part of her look and she likes it though, and that’s what matters. Love her.
June 13th, 2007 at 10:49 am
Who IS this woman?! CBB posts about her all the time but I have yet to find out who she is/why she is a celebrity? Is she a porn star?
June 13th, 2007 at 11:18 am
OMG Can’t believe she’s cancelled her book signings! I was going to see her on Saturday at Waterstones!! Im gutted now! Lol!
June 13th, 2007 at 11:38 am
Katie looks amazing!! She looks so comfortable in her skin and she’s glowing!! The picture is a little too “plastic” for my tastes–but still a gorgeous shot!! I wish her all the happiness in the world!! I hope that all the bad times and mishaps are behind her and she can just enjoy having the little girl she has always dreamed of!! Best of Luck to she and Peter!!
June 13th, 2007 at 12:16 pm
She will be “taking off 8 weeks”??? Taking off from WHAT?? What does she do exactly?
She seems so fake but then, most of these celebs with no real talent look fake . . . overly make up and overly photoshoped.
June 13th, 2007 at 12:45 pm
her arms and legs don’t look like they’re in proportion with everything else. They look like mannequins.
June 13th, 2007 at 1:02 pm
All I have to say is, “Uh-huh.”
June 13th, 2007 at 1:44 pm
Well, obviously she has been photoshopped. I’m positive that as a woman who has had 2 children and is due anytime now with the third that she has her share of stretch marks and cellulite right now. Coming from someone who herself is 8 months along, I share in these unfortunate side effects of pregnanct as well. No woman, I don’t care who, looks that flawless after 3 pregnancies!I’m sure that Katie wouldn’t have done the photoshoot if she thought they *wouldn’t* touch her up before they went to print. I wouldn’t have!
But the editor’s did get a bit too happy with the mouse when they were erasing and smoothing things out on the computer. Not a fan of the frosty lipstick and overly teased hair either. Reminds me of the early nineties.
June 13th, 2007 at 1:47 pm
being from england i know a fair bit about this couple, and katie is always done up with the thick makeup and hair extentions. she did take them out not long after junior was born but it didnt last long. its just who she is.
the only “complaint” i have about the photo is the randomness of it, either have them both naked (or at least bare tourso) and make it arty or both of them clothed. i just dont get why one is naked and one clothed.
June 13th, 2007 at 2:02 pm
comfortable in her skin? is that what you call it? she photographs well? don’t you mean she ‘photoshops’ well?
good god…do they actually think ppl will look at this and admire them for their beauty? both of them need to take off the plastered make-up…a REAL beauty is one who does not need to wear all of the makeup
jessica simpson–oh, so much prettier with a make-up free face!!
June 13th, 2007 at 2:46 pm
Katie’s face looks like modeling shoot from Vogue or something, while her body is unrealistically too smooth and obviously Photoshopped. If you look, she has no natural creases between her thigh and belly or at the top of her leg, none by her knee, none under her breast, or anywhere for that matter, which makes her especially look unnatural.
Peter’s face and hands are perfectly smooth as well, which gives him a slightly unnatural look as well.”
I agree with Autumn. They took away her natural lines/crease of her legs and even of her chest. It seems like they added that one in and lowered it, making her look awkward. And her legs look weird with the crease stopping halfway, and her butt seems to have been lopped off and squarish. Peter just looks…plastic. They both do.
Honestly, they’re a beautiful couple done wrong by too much Photoshop touch ups.
And it does seem weird that she’s fully undressed and Peter’s fully clothed. What was the director of the shoot thinking?
They look better in their natural environments away from all things computer enhanced/altered.
June 13th, 2007 at 2:48 pm
Natalie S., you said it.
And Sarah, she is famous for being a British “glamour” (whatever that means) model, her massive breasts (which she is obsessed with talking about every chance she gets), and the fact that her fashion choices make Britney look like a nun. In other words, she’s Britain’s version of Paris Hilton.
I am so glad their show never took off here in the U.S. England can have her.
June 13th, 2007 at 3:23 pm
LMAO Lauren!!!!! You took the words right out of my mouth!
June 13th, 2007 at 4:19 pm
Her boobs are bigger than her belly! I have D-cups and by my 6th month with both pregnancies my stomach was much larger than my boobs. Good grief!
And they both look completely unnatural!
June 13th, 2007 at 4:42 pm
Touched up or not – the photo is beautiful and very tasteful =) I love seeing pregnant women so comfortable in their skin – truly gorgeous!
June 13th, 2007 at 6:25 pm
That photo is so over edited it’s amusing. What is she afraid of showing?
I’m a photographer and even *I* think that it’s too much photoshop. Her skin is most likely guassian blurred to make her look less blotchy and wrinkled or freckled and she has absolutely NO stretch marks or blemishes anywhere! LOL…do they expect people to think that is what she looks like for REAL?
He looks like he should be in Madame Tussaud’s Wax Museum. SO PHONY!!!
I understand wanting to look good for a portrait but she’s telling her kids and her fans that’s it not okay to look “natural”.
The pose is nice, but everything else about the photo is so fake..why bother?
June 13th, 2007 at 6:27 pm
After looking at it again, more closely, they have taken her head from a different shot and repositioned it on her body..that’s why most of you are finding something “off” about the photograph and the position of her body.
They also went a bit overboard on slimming out her backside..they made it square! LOL
June 13th, 2007 at 7:22 pm
TracyG you are spot on. Her head has been taken off another photo. Looks stranger the longer you look at it.
Funny how everyone thinks she looks “so comfortable” showing her body. Her body is fake and so is her face, she wears a mask. How does that make someone “comfortable in their own skin”?
June 14th, 2007 at 1:20 am
awful pictures…
June 14th, 2007 at 9:00 am
Some of you people are so RUDE!! And it annoys me when people have answered what you’ve asked already, but then you stil continue to go ‘Whats she famous for?!’ Just read through peoples comments and you will find out!
So what if she made money from being a glamour model! I’m BRITISH and Katie is a well repected business woman, who has made her own money without the aid of anyone! The people who are mean about her are just stuck up! Katie is a brilliant Mother, business woman, author, clothing designer etc. You should all check your facts before you are rude.
At least she is real and doesn’t care what anybody things about her! Shes down to earth and speaks her mind. If she wants to dress the way she dresses and wear that much makeup then thats her decision! And its not for anyone to look down upon!
June 14th, 2007 at 9:35 am
While comment makers might be called rude, this is a woman who has shown no respect for her unborn daughter…talking about seeing her “bits” (genitals) as soon as she is born. Now, does that put a picture of a naked baby girl in mind, or not? Forget about the picture. She is her own worst image maker with her own mouth.
June 14th, 2007 at 9:55 am
Who said she is a well respected business woman in the UK. She is not. She is a total slapper and regarded with great ridicule.
June 14th, 2007 at 1:15 pm
I think she’s amazing. She’s done wonderful things for herself, she’s a good mother, and they are a great couple.
Seriously people, why are you so mean about someone you don’t even know? What’s with the attack? I agree she’s wearing too much makeup and the photo looks plastic – so? What does it matter to you?
Can’t you just be nice to these people? They’re about to have their third child, their first daughter, and you’re attacking them for being photo shopped?
June 14th, 2007 at 1:57 pm
What a slut. I hate this woman, she needs to stop crapping out babies like she thinks they’re toys.
June 14th, 2007 at 4:45 pm
Isn’t she the same woman whose son has had two severe accidents in one year. Didn’t Harvey get cut up by a mirror that broke and didn’t he also scald himself when not being watched properly? A Good mother? What a fine example of what motherhood should be.
This woman looks like a street-walker and has more silicone than the caulk around my bathtub.
What an example for her soon-to-be daughter. I hope she doesn’t dress her up like a miniature of herself.
June 14th, 2007 at 10:29 pm
Indigo, Kait- ITA! I don’t see why people are constantly bashing someone they don’t even know! So what if she does things that you don’t agree with? It’s HER life, and she should be allowed to live it the way she chooses! I am also very glad that she explained about the mirror accident. Hopefully now people will realize that the accident really WAS just that- an accident, and one that couldn’t be prevented (since the mirror simply fell off the wall WITHOUT provecation from Harvey)!
As for her comment about wanting to see her daughter’s “bits” the minute she was born, I highly doubt she was actually serious about that. She more than likely said that tongue-in-cheek.
June 16th, 2007 at 9:43 pm
Weird picture, she is nude and he is fully dressed, what does that mean. She looks so airbrused too, her arms, legs look weird with her belly. But she is a playboy type girl, so no wonder she always wants nude pics and is always talking about getting a 4th implant job to say sexy. She seems very tacky and tasteless IMO.
June 17th, 2007 at 4:56 pm
Brookefan, I think you’ll find Katie is known for her tongue and cheek comment and everything shouldn’t be taken so seriously. (rolls eyes)
And Ashley, how the hell is someone whos one Mother of the year looked upon with ridicule??! :S In previous years yes, Jordan was a figure of ridicule, buts shes turned her carrer and life around! People move on and change, shame others cant.
June 20th, 2007 at 1:40 pm
GOODLUCK KATE WITH BABY CRYSTAL. ALL THE BEST, LUVING P&K, X
June 26th, 2007 at 7:06 am
that pic is descuting and there not a good cupple
June 28th, 2007 at 9:56 am
I am not a fan of Katie Price or Peter. Having an opinion on someone is a personal thing and people shouldn’t be having a go at each other for differing opinions that is insulting!
Jordan is famous for having fake boobs and flaunting them, This is a picture of Peter and Jordan NOT Katie and Peter and she should have been Katie in it, less made up and more natural. Cutting off the head that was shot and puttting a modelling shot was a mistake. The pose was a good idea but her head is at the wrong angle. This could have been a nice picture but it isn’t.
As for her being well respected, not by most of the british public! I never watch her or buy magazines because she is on the cover I wish she would go back to obscurity!
As for being a good Mum, maybe she should try working less and concentrating on her children, what is she doing working (or trying to) right up until the birth of her daughter? Maybe she should stay at home and look after her children herself it’s not as if she hasn’t made enough money to last the rest of her life!
October 4th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
jordan and peter should be alowwed to do whatever they like with thier life. its thier lives not yours so stop having moaning at them.. i for one think their a great couple.. congrats to peter for grbbing a hot girl..