no jessica l not all of us mothers eat it up that because a celebrity child has it on it has to be the best and i have to have one just like it. to me what my son looks cute in is what i buy i dont care what anjelina jolie’s kid is wearing my son is himself not little maddox by the way is adorable my first thing to my son is unconditional love and being there fashion is 10th on my list

that really annoys me! she has how much money yet still gets free stuff! and not samples either pushchairs and god know what else!! yes i am sure the companies see it as good advertising if she chooses theres to push her baby in, but there is me that raises 3 children alone while pregnant with a 4th and we had to make do with handouts or charity! i wish i could afford a new pushchair for this baby but i cannot! and hearing that she (yes she has worked hard all her life) is getting stuff for free makes me mad! I worked hard and all i get is a slap in the face from the goverment and the world!

Selling gifts and pocketing the money? No, not tacky at all.

I have never understood why people place celebs on such a high pedastal with regards to gifts, photos, etc. I see ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with her setting up a trust for her child! Who is anybody to say how she should handle her finances. Do you really think that Larry Birkhead donates any of the money he makes from “selling” Dannielynn photo ops to charity?? My guess is the money goes into a trust for her. Even when Brangelina gave the $4M they got for Shiloh’s first pictures to charity, you don’t think that Angie had a say in where the money went? I don’t buy this altruistic bit with celebrities – why should everybody make money off of MY baby besides me?!

If it’s anyone’s fault it’s the companies for paying in the first place!!

Wait wait wait…the British BURN their gifts? WTF?

I think the idea is awesome- celebrities could rack up lots of money for charity by autioning their kiddos’ clothes. I would be to want a celebrity baby outfit!!

I really doubt this is true.

i think this is a total fabrication.

saying that though, as much as i dont believe it, if it were true i do agree that they were gifts given to her, it is for her to with them what she will and if she wants to sell them and put the money into a trust fund for her child then that is her choice. better to do that than just have them sat doing nothing. just because she is famous and earns more money than we could dream of does not mean she has to give the money from the sale of the items away to charity.

As it is comning from the SUN it’s probably false but like most of you said if she really doesn’t want the stuff she should give it away or raise money for charity. It’s a little arrogant not to when your a celeb.

No way is this true. I know nothing about Charlotte Church, but I cannot imagine ANYBODY who is famous and well-off doing this. You would have to be a piece of work to sell freebies and pocket the cash for your kid. Even if she wanted to do this, where would she find the time? Isn’t she a famous singer “married” to a famous sports guy? This is ridiculous and absolutely untrue IMO. Any idiot knows how bad this would make her look if she did it.

The only famous person who has ever done something even close to this tacky was multi-millionairess Catherine Zeta-Jones, who told all of her wedding guests not to give her wedding gifts, but instead to put money into a fund for her son. People gave her tons of flack about that.

to jessica l yes i am someone who is interested in celebrity babies and all babies and children but my child does wear clothes and i do not obsess over what what these celebrity children wear and just fork over 200 for a pair of jeans that in two months he will outgrow what i concetrate on is loving and taking care of my child and in my downtime i am on the internet and yes i can bash the companies that is my right and its my right to not eat up what most parents eat up and i dress my son nicely but not by what is in a magazine