Isla Fisher out in Hollywood on Tuesday
Actress Isla Fisher, 31, was spotted out in Hollywood on Tuesday. She expects her first child any time now!

Photo by x17; specifically for use on the Celebrity Baby Blog, Inc only. Use on other sites is prohibited without purchase.
Post a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the site staff has approved them.
The following types of comments will not be posted:
- namecalling.
- any type of discrimination.
- explicit sexual references.
- advertising and spam.
- off-topic and completely unrelated to the post.
We are cautious about discussions on volatile topics such as abortion, religion, politics and race.
If you have questions, concerns, or breaking news to share, please contact us at CBBTips@gmail.com rather than posting a comment.
Feel free to agree or disagree with each other as long as you do it respectfully, remembering that we all have our own experiences and perspectives. Keep in mind that there are people on the other end reading what you write.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.
October 16th, 2007 at 8:45 pm
maybe i’m late to ask this, but she seems like she’s been pregnant forever! is she having twins? she’s looked 8 or 9 months pregnant for quite some time, maybe there’s something more in there
October 16th, 2007 at 11:41 pm
Anything is possible! But I think it’s just because she is so short and has a smaller torso. Naomi Watts and Salma Hayek looked pretty big too, but taller women like Bridget Moynahan and Heidi Klum didn’t look so big.
October 17th, 2007 at 2:06 am
Um probably a really silly question, but I’ll ask it anyway!!
Do shorter/more petite women have smaller babies as there is less room to grow? And taller women have larger babies, as there is more room for the baby to grow?
I hope I dont regret asking this question! LOL.
October 17th, 2007 at 7:11 am
yeah i agree with you dee, she’s one of those women that seem to be pregnant forever.
she looks good though!
October 17th, 2007 at 7:34 am
I don’t know about anyone else, but when I was this pregnant, the last thing I wanted to do was go out anywhere. I wanted to lie back with my feet up and do nothing. I see a picture of her out and about almost everyday. I was too exhausted to think about shopping or going out to eat. But I guess I was never worried about keeping my picture in the press either.
October 17th, 2007 at 8:27 am
I think she looks great! A lot of women show large. I’m pregnant now and due in early January and I had someone say to me the other day, “you better have that baby soon or he’s going to end up a 17 pounder”. That’s just rude.
October 17th, 2007 at 9:22 am
i don’t think that’s a silly question. But I think it has more to do with genetics than anything. OB’s and midwives often ask how big the parents were at birth. For instance I am 5′8″ & I was a 6 pounder at birth & my husband was a 4 lb preemie & my girls were 6lb 5 oz (and i was overdue) &
5 lb 11 oz. Hope that helps
October 17th, 2007 at 9:37 am
Please never ask a woman if she is pregnant with twins that is so incredibly rude. Seriously if one more person asks me that I will smack them. I swear people seem to think that they can say any rude comment they want about a woman’s weight when they are pregnant.
October 17th, 2007 at 9:52 am
Iluvallbabies-
I think it depends-
I’m 5′4″, I looked just like Salma Hayek while pregnant and my first son was 9 pounds 2 1/2 weeks early, and my second was 8 and 1/2 pounds 3 weeks early. No diabetes, no complications, but my husband is 6′5 and was 10 pounds 2 ounces at birth.
My friend who is the same size was 9 days late had a baby who was 7lb 3 oz! You just never know!!!
October 17th, 2007 at 10:52 am
Not only is she very pregnant, this photo makes her look like she has four arms!
My husband is 6 feet 6 inches, and I am 5 feet 8. Our first was 5lbs. 11 oz, full term, and 21 inches long. The nurse took his measurements, looked at his dad, and said, “he’s built just like you, long and skinny.”
October 17th, 2007 at 8:33 pm
I’m barely over 5″ and had a really large baby (nearly 9lbs) for my height. No GD, and my husband and I both were normal sized babies. It’s definitely possible for short women to have large babies! I had no appetite at the end, because the baby was squishing my stomach – and it was getting really difficult to breathe. Also, my ribs stretched about 6″ larger than they were (from a 34 to a 40 bra band) to make room for the baby and never went entirely back. You tall women are so lucky!
I can really sympathize with Isla!
October 17th, 2007 at 9:47 pm
Iluvallbabies–
From my personal experience, I’d say your baby size has more to do with how big you and your hubby/boyfriend/whatever was at birth. I was 7.5lb. and my husband was almost 9 lbs. I am 5′3″ and am around 160-170. I have no torso whatsoever, so I was horribly uncomfortable by around 6 months. And I stayed that way until my 8lb., 21 1/4 inches long, 37 weeker, Jordan was delivered. He was a big boy and he still is a big boy!
October 18th, 2007 at 6:59 pm
X17 says there is a rumor that she had the baby last night. Nothing confirmed.
October 19th, 2007 at 12:26 am
x17 are reporting that she may have had the baby – still waiting for confirmation though.
October 19th, 2007 at 6:24 am
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=272508
they say she gave birth to a baby girl