Comments on: Gabrielle Reece in Pregnancy Magazine http://celebrity-babies.com/2007/10/22/gabrielle-reece-8/ Celebrating the lifestyle of Hollywood's newest moms and littlest stars. Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:19:05 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: raincoaster http://celebrity-babies.com/2007/10/22/gabrielle-reece-8/#comment-100546 raincoaster Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:07:41 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/gabrielle-reece-8#comment-100546 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>What, no picture of the hottest father to be on the planet??? Awwww!</p> </div>

What, no picture of the hottest father to be on the planet??? Awwww!

]]> By: Tricia http://celebrity-babies.com/2007/10/22/gabrielle-reece-8/#comment-100550 Tricia Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:30:08 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/gabrielle-reece-8#comment-100550 <p>Regarding the size of her belly, let's remember she's a big girl--around 6 ft. tall., I believe. When I first saw Cindy Crawford pregnant on TV, some time in her third trimester & looking "small", I remember thinking (even tho' I like her!) something along the lines of "Horrible supermodel! Compromising her unborn child's health!"--and then her son was born at @8 lbs. The bump often just looks smaller on the tall woman (Bridget Moynahan being the latest exception to that rule! :)</p> Regarding the size of her belly, let’s remember she’s a big girl–around 6 ft. tall., I believe. When I first saw Cindy Crawford pregnant on TV, some time in her third trimester & looking “small”, I remember thinking (even tho’ I like her!) something along the lines of “Horrible supermodel! Compromising her unborn child’s health!”–and then her son was born at @8 lbs. The bump often just looks smaller on the tall woman (Bridget Moynahan being the latest exception to that rule! :)

]]> By: Michelle http://celebrity-babies.com/2007/10/22/gabrielle-reece-8/#comment-100556 Michelle Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:19:25 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/gabrielle-reece-8#comment-100556 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Okay, she is 7 months pregnant??? I looked like that when I was 3!! But I guess if I worked out as heavily every day I might look like that too.. </p> <p><strong>Sarah's note: She's not 7 months in the photos. Magazine shoots are done months in advance -- the pics were likely shot in August or around there. Gabby is very small still though, from recent photos!</strong></p></div>

Okay, she is 7 months pregnant??? I looked like that when I was 3!! But I guess if I worked out as heavily every day I might look like that too..

Sarah’s note: She’s not 7 months in the photos. Magazine shoots are done months in advance — the pics were likely shot in August or around there. Gabby is very small still though, from recent photos!

]]> By: snow http://celebrity-babies.com/2007/10/22/gabrielle-reece-8/#comment-100565 snow Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:40:10 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/gabrielle-reece-8#comment-100565 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>LOVED that ball for laboring too! That was the easiest labor and delivery I had was when I labored on the ball rocking back and forth, no epidural either! :o)</p> </div>

LOVED that ball for laboring too! That was the easiest labor and delivery I had was when I labored on the ball rocking back and forth, no epidural either! :o )

]]> By: gianna http://celebrity-babies.com/2007/10/22/gabrielle-reece-8/#comment-100573 gianna Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:26:08 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/gabrielle-reece-8#comment-100573 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>I'm not surprised, she has always been in good shape</p> </div>

I’m not surprised, she has always been in good shape

]]> By: FC http://celebrity-babies.com/2007/10/22/gabrielle-reece-8/#comment-100580 FC Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:45:54 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/gabrielle-reece-8#comment-100580 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>She looks fabulous! I'd love to look a fraction of that whenever I happen to have one of my own! But she seriously is only baby bump and that's it. Not that I'm surprised. This is just about how she was with Reece Viola. Though, given her athletic background, I can't say I expected less.</p> <p>Still can't wait to see/hear what this baby will be in a few more months, boy or girl. :)Maybe a boy? :)</p></div>

She looks fabulous! I’d love to look a fraction of that whenever I happen to have one of my own! But she seriously is only baby bump and that’s it. Not that I’m surprised. This is just about how she was with Reece Viola. Though, given her athletic background, I can’t say I expected less.

Still can’t wait to see/hear what this baby will be in a few more months, boy or girl. :) Maybe a boy? :)

]]>