Denied: Michelle Branch not expecting second child

4 Responses to “Denied: Michelle Branch not expecting second child”

1. Meg Says:
   December 30th, 2007 at 2:48 pm

   Oh, I love her! I hope she is. She is a brilliant artist.

2. Pam Says:
   December 31st, 2007 at 1:12 am

   That’d be great news and wouldn’t surprise me. Seems like a lot of people do that kind of spacing. I love their naming style and am happily surprised to see they are still together. I admit I doubter when they first married because of the age difference, but Michelle seems very mature.

3. Cass Says:
   December 31st, 2007 at 2:33 pm

   Michelle has denied the rumor on her site (see post #12): http://www.michellebranch.com/index.php?s=c40149e37a611befa502a77bfb949eb1&showtopic=286

4. Meg Says:
   January 1st, 2008 at 4:33 pm

   New album? Well, if they’re not having a new gorgeous baby, a new album would be okay too.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the site staff has approved them.

The following types of comments will not be posted:

• namecalling.
• any type of discrimination.
• explicit sexual references.
• advertising and spam.
• off-topic and completely unrelated to the post.

We are cautious about discussions on volatile topics such as abortion, religion, politics and race.

If you have questions, concerns, or breaking news to share, please contact us at CBBTips@gmail.com rather than posting a comment.

Feel free to agree or disagree with each other as long as you do it respectfully, remembering that we all have our own experiences and perspectives. Keep in mind that there are people on the other end reading what you write.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.