Sign up to get cute photos, exclusive giveaways, special offers and more!
Sign Up"She looks great! I really think it’s going to be a girl this time!"
-Brooklyn, on Elisabeth Hasselbeck Bumps It Up in Black"Our first child was not the easiest of babies, which is why we left it five years before the second. Our second was a dream baby."
- Hugh Jackman, on Hugh Jackman Defends Madonna’s Malawian AdoptionActress Holly Hunter, 49, and her partner, actor Gordon MacDonald, take their twin sons to the park and to run errands in New York today. The boys, whose names we do not know, will turn 2 next week.
Photos by Bauer Griffin.
The twins ride in phil&teds Sport buggy in orange ($400) with doubles kit ($90).
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the site staff has approved them.
The following types of comments will not be posted:
We are cautious about discussions on volatile topics such as abortion, religion, politics and race.
If you have questions, concerns, or breaking news to share, please contact us at CBBTips@gmail.com rather than posting a comment.
Feel free to agree or disagree with each other as long as you do it respectfully, remembering that we all have our own experiences and perspectives. Keep in mind that there are people on the other end reading what you write.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.
Levi McConaughey Turns 1!
Daddy's Girls: Pops and Their Princesses
Little Rascal: Jagger Rooney's First Year
Family Album: The Watts-Schreibers
Family Album: The Richie-Maddens
January 10th, 2008 at 11:55 pm
The boys names are Claude and Press
January 11th, 2008 at 5:08 am
Beautiful boys. The expression in the little boy’s face in the second photo is priceless. So cute.
January 11th, 2008 at 8:45 am
Wow,
This is the first pics of Holly’s children I have ever seen. They really do exist. She is very good at keeping them (and herself) out of the spotlight. A beautiful family!
January 11th, 2008 at 8:45 am
I could never use that stroller, it looks like the one in the back can’t even see anything!
January 11th, 2008 at 8:54 am
There’s something about that stroller that strikes me as odd. I’m sure it’s design that way to be more compact but that poor child that has to sit in the back is only looking at the back seat. Meanwhile the older sibling gets to enjoy all the sights. That space should be meant for storage not for a child.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:10 am
It’s great to finally see these boys! I was beginning to wonder if we’d ever see them.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:14 am
I think those are the coolest strollers. I’d never be able to use one though. My daughter would constantly be reaching out and grabbing the wheels while rising in the buggy.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:54 am
Please clarify if it’s just the angle, but does the 2nd seat on that stroller sit directly behind the first one? That isn’t cool. Why would anyone do that to their kids? I would put them in a side by side stroller over that one anyday.
January 11th, 2008 at 10:51 am
Holly Hunter is cute as a bug, but she needs to ditch that hat! Nice to see her boyz. Didn’t know she had them, but I am a fan of hers!
January 11th, 2008 at 11:59 am
I had that stroller and both of my daughters freaked out and would not sit in the back. When my older daughter finally caved and did sit back there, she got her hand caught in the wheel and had to go to the hospital. I ended up selling it and getting the Jane Powertwin… awesome stroller. Much better compared to the Phil & Ted’s.
January 11th, 2008 at 12:19 pm
Perhaps the purpose of the design of this particular double stroller is to avoid taking up too much space. I am constantly frustrated by families who take up entire sidewalks or store aisles with their side-by-side double strollers. This looks like a good solution, and really, what is it going to hurt the child in the back seat to have no view for a few minutes. If anything, children today are so over-stimulated that a little boredom might be good for them!
January 11th, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Ha I clicked on here expecting anti P&T comments, you guys are so predictable
I have the P&T and have to say, try it before you knock it!
In fact the comment from Kate really surprised me as I know loads of people with it and we’ve all had the opposite problem that the kids always WANT to be in the back! I have NEVER heard of anyone else’s child being injured by the wheels either! If they’re strapped in properly they shouldn’t reach them.
In answer to the above, most people round here do have them because of the space saving. Pavements (sidewalks) in this part of England are very narrow and shops not much better so without this buggy I wouldn’t be able to buy food! Also it’s far better balanced than a double buggy so I don’t have the worry of tipping it over when moving about.
oooh and just to add that the kid at the back has a great view…..out the sides!
Kid’s heads can turn you know
January 11th, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Jemma:
Love your comment.
January 11th, 2008 at 2:21 pm
Gotta say that that weird stroller kept me from even looking at the boys. I understand the practicality of it…. but YUCK!!
January 11th, 2008 at 2:38 pm
My sister-in-law has this stroller for her girls and she loves it. The 7 month old goes on the bottom and naps, and the 3 year old sits up top. She bought it because she felt the wide strollers were hard to move around and navigate with.
January 11th, 2008 at 4:27 pm
As a collector of double strollers ( I have 7) this one wasn’t my fave. I have a friend who lives in the UK and has had one very similar to this one and LOVED it.
As far as big families taking up sidewalks with big strollers or isles at stores, try to be the person pushing and navigating them. NOTHING drives me more crazy then when I take my 4 kids to the mall and can’t shop in the kids stores because neither of my double strollers fit thru to see the clothes.
Maybe someday I will design a stroller I like..:)