<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brooke Burke on the last weeks of pregnancy and having portraits taken</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/</link>
	<description>Celebrating the lifestyle of Hollywood&#039;s newest moms and littlest stars.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:19:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gabriella</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/#comment-75513</link>
		<dc:creator>gabriella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 07:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl#comment-75513</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Asherzahakaif that&#039;s why I like these pictures too. They get straight to the point and show the baby bump which is beautiful to see, yet brooke is dressed in the pictures . Not like others like christina, britney, etc where their photoshoots seemed more like just nudity and a bit more tacky imo. They&#039;re a great family, can&#039;t wait to hear the baby&#039;s name. &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Asherzahakaif that&#8217;s why I like these pictures too. They get straight to the point and show the baby bump which is beautiful to see, yet brooke is dressed in the pictures . Not like others like christina, britney, etc where their photoshoots seemed more like just nudity and a bit more tacky imo. They&#8217;re a great family, can&#8217;t wait to hear the baby&#8217;s name. </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briana</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/#comment-75517</link>
		<dc:creator>Briana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl#comment-75517</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The previous photos are from the photoshoot when she was pregnant with Rain - she did include the girls in those photos.  If she has an agreement with her ex-husband , why would it be okay for her to show pictures of them from the last pregnancy, and not this one ? Plus those are family photos too, even if they weren&#039;t displayed on the website - they still could have been taken.  And she says that she only took the pictures with Rain.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just think it is odd to have a photoshoot with only your children from your current marriage.  Or a photoshoot with just one of your children.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If she&#039;s not allowed to include the kids in publicity, then she should be careful of what she does with Rain also.  All her older daughters can see is that Rain shown with mommy a lot more than they are.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am really really not trying to pass judgment, but it seems like you always hear her talk about Rain before the other girls.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The previous photos are from the photoshoot when she was pregnant with Rain &#8211; she did include the girls in those photos.  If she has an agreement with her ex-husband , why would it be okay for her to show pictures of them from the last pregnancy, and not this one ? Plus those are family photos too, even if they weren&#8217;t displayed on the website &#8211; they still could have been taken.  And she says that she only took the pictures with Rain.  </p>
<p>I just think it is odd to have a photoshoot with only your children from your current marriage.  Or a photoshoot with just one of your children.  </p>
<p>If she&#8217;s not allowed to include the kids in publicity, then she should be careful of what she does with Rain also.  All her older daughters can see is that Rain shown with mommy a lot more than they are.  </p>
<p>I am really really not trying to pass judgment, but it seems like you always hear her talk about Rain before the other girls.  </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: briana</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/#comment-75521</link>
		<dc:creator>briana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl#comment-75521</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;with them i always get the feeling that the oldest two daughters are left out.  i don&#039;t know why i feel this way, but every single time i see a picture or a story i feel this way.  &lt;br /&gt;
I do think it is a shame to not have included the older girls in this photoshoot.  Why just her children with David ? Even just a shot of two with the older girls would have been special.  I couldn&#039;t imagine having three children and only doing a photoshoot with the youngest ?!?  If the children were all from the same father, it would have never been broken up like that.  It just doesn&#039;t seem right to me.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m really not trying to pass judgment.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sarah&#039;s note: There&#039;s lots of pics of the girls on the link Brooke gave...I could only include 3 pics because of copyright, and I chose my favorites.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;She may also have a deal with Garth, like Shanna Moakler and Oscar de la Hoya have, to not have the kids include in press and publicity, or in a limited capacity.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with them i always get the feeling that the oldest two daughters are left out.  i don&#8217;t know why i feel this way, but every single time i see a picture or a story i feel this way.  <br />
I do think it is a shame to not have included the older girls in this photoshoot.  Why just her children with David ? Even just a shot of two with the older girls would have been special.  I couldn&#8217;t imagine having three children and only doing a photoshoot with the youngest ?!?  If the children were all from the same father, it would have never been broken up like that.  It just doesn&#8217;t seem right to me.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m really not trying to pass judgment.  </p>
<p><strong>Sarah&#8217;s note: There&#8217;s lots of pics of the girls on the link Brooke gave&#8230;I could only include 3 pics because of copyright, and I chose my favorites.</strong></p>
<p>She may also have a deal with Garth, like Shanna Moakler and Oscar de la Hoya have, to not have the kids include in press and publicity, or in a limited capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/#comment-75526</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl#comment-75526</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Such beautiful pictures!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Brooke is just lovely....I especially love the picture of her and David together, what an amazing looking couple.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Such beautiful pictures!</p>
<p>Brooke is just lovely&#8230;.I especially love the picture of her and David together, what an amazing looking couple.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/#comment-75537</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl#comment-75537</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;If you read on the site of the photographer who took the pictures, they have plenty of solutions (in other words photoshop) for stretch marks and other imperfections that people rather have brushed away...&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>If you read on the site of the photographer who took the pictures, they have plenty of solutions (in other words photoshop) for stretch marks and other imperfections that people rather have brushed away&#8230;</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asherzarakaif</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/#comment-75544</link>
		<dc:creator>asherzarakaif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 08:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl#comment-75544</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you follow the link BB gives for the rest of the pictures, you&#039;ll notice that her older two daughters are actually included in the session.  I don&#039;t think that they have been ignored at all, but they may also be at that point in their lives where they don&#039;t actually want to be included in every picture or every outing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On another note, I really like that BB&#039;s pictures are not totally nude.  The point of these pictures is her bump, not nudity.  I guess I&#039;m just conservative like that. During my pregnancies, as happy as I was with my bump, the last thing I wanted to do was show off the rest of my body.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>If you follow the link BB gives for the rest of the pictures, you&#8217;ll notice that her older two daughters are actually included in the session.  I don&#8217;t think that they have been ignored at all, but they may also be at that point in their lives where they don&#8217;t actually want to be included in every picture or every outing.</p>
<p>On another note, I really like that BB&#8217;s pictures are not totally nude.  The point of these pictures is her bump, not nudity.  I guess I&#8217;m just conservative like that. During my pregnancies, as happy as I was with my bump, the last thing I wanted to do was show off the rest of my body.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabriella</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/#comment-75555</link>
		<dc:creator>gabriella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 07:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl#comment-75555</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;What brooke meant was that she used this photographer for both of her recent pregnancies, that&#039;s why she said both because the link she gave on her site showed pics of her pregnancy from rain and now this one. She has made references to neriah and sieraa&#039;s pregnancies in the past, but honestly most people don&#039;t remember her pregancies back than. Mainly because 8 yrs ago when she had her 1st daughter, celebrity pregnancies weren&#039;t so focused like they are now, and I think since she is having these babies with david another celebrity, it tends to get more attention. And even with people I know they say 8-9yrs ago pregnancy was different than it is now, people dressed different, didn&#039;t show their bumps as much, and definitely with celebrities I don&#039;t even remember as many photos of pregnant celebrities from like 8yrs ago.  She always includes her older daughters though, on her site the main page has all 3 girls on it. I wasn&#039;t sure now to pronounce neriah&#039;s name either, until I heard brooke say it on interviews, and than it sounded so easy to me. I wasn&#039;t crazy about her daughter&#039;s names at first, but their kinda catchy and flow together now lol. &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>What brooke meant was that she used this photographer for both of her recent pregnancies, that&#8217;s why she said both because the link she gave on her site showed pics of her pregnancy from rain and now this one. She has made references to neriah and sieraa&#8217;s pregnancies in the past, but honestly most people don&#8217;t remember her pregancies back than. Mainly because 8 yrs ago when she had her 1st daughter, celebrity pregnancies weren&#8217;t so focused like they are now, and I think since she is having these babies with david another celebrity, it tends to get more attention. And even with people I know they say 8-9yrs ago pregnancy was different than it is now, people dressed different, didn&#8217;t show their bumps as much, and definitely with celebrities I don&#8217;t even remember as many photos of pregnant celebrities from like 8yrs ago.  She always includes her older daughters though, on her site the main page has all 3 girls on it. I wasn&#8217;t sure now to pronounce neriah&#8217;s name either, until I heard brooke say it on interviews, and than it sounded so easy to me. I wasn&#8217;t crazy about her daughter&#8217;s names at first, but their kinda catchy and flow together now lol. </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MH</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/#comment-75562</link>
		<dc:creator>MH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 06:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl#comment-75562</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;to CeleBabyLover,&lt;br /&gt;
Brooke probably just meant that in the exact meaning it is suppose to mean:  she&#039;s had had two sessions with her before.  no other sessions, not with her previous two pregnancies.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>to CeleBabyLover,<br />
Brooke probably just meant that in the exact meaning it is suppose to mean:  she&#8217;s had had two sessions with her before.  no other sessions, not with her previous two pregnancies.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/#comment-75569</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 06:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl#comment-75569</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe this is long overdue since Brooke has been on celebrity baby blog for AGES! but how exactly do you say her first daughters name? Neriah? Obviously the others are pretty straightforward but whenever I see that one, I&#039;m always confused how to pronounce it...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sarah&#039;s note: Na-rye-ahh.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Maybe this is long overdue since Brooke has been on celebrity baby blog for AGES! but how exactly do you say her first daughters name? Neriah? Obviously the others are pretty straightforward but whenever I see that one, I&#8217;m always confused how to pronounce it&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Sarah&#8217;s note: Na-rye-ahh.</strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bren</title>
		<link>http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl/#comment-75575</link>
		<dc:creator>Bren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brooke-burke-bl#comment-75575</guid>
		<description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I love those pictures!! She is gorgeous...I wish I had taken photos of my belly when I was pregnant with my daughter!! but I have none :( I was going through a diffucult time plus I had stretchmarks :(  I have a lot of my daughter as a baby though :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I went to see the pictures and I saw pictures of Brooke with her 2 oldest daughters when she was pregnant with Rain, those pictures are cute too!!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ps. Can we only use those wraps that Brooke sell when we just had a baby? I still have a few lbs. to go and those wraps seem like they might help!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I love those pictures!! She is gorgeous&#8230;I wish I had taken photos of my belly when I was pregnant with my daughter!! but I have none <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  I was going through a diffucult time plus I had stretchmarks <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   I have a lot of my daughter as a baby though <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I went to see the pictures and I saw pictures of Brooke with her 2 oldest daughters when she was pregnant with Rain, those pictures are cute too!!</p>
<p>Ps. Can we only use those wraps that Brooke sell when we just had a baby? I still have a few lbs. to go and those wraps seem like they might help!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
