Sign up to get cute photos, exclusive giveaways, special offers and more!
Sign Up"Oh my gosh, look at Honor’s little scrunched up eyebrows!! She does not look like a happy camper but dang she sure is a cutie."
-Thrifty Sisters Coupon Clippers, on Honor Warren: Queen of Hearts"It’s great, you know, if you don’t need much sleep and enjoy being covered in milk, phlegm and baby feces all the time."
- Liev Schreiber, on Liev Schreiber Dishes on an ‘Incredibly Active’ SashaActress Nicole Kidman, 40, and her husband, country singer Keith Urban, also 40, spent the day at Maroubra beach in Sydney, Australia last Thursday. The couple expect their first child together in July; they know the sex, but are not sharing.
Photo by ICON/Fame Pictures.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the site staff has approved them.
The following types of comments will not be posted:
We are cautious about discussions on volatile topics such as abortion, religion, politics and race.
If you have questions, concerns, or breaking news to share, please contact us at CBBTips@gmail.com rather than posting a comment.
Feel free to agree or disagree with each other as long as you do it respectfully, remembering that we all have our own experiences and perspectives. Keep in mind that there are people on the other end reading what you write.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.
Levi McConaughey Turns 1!
Daddy's Girls: Pops and Their Princesses
Little Rascal: Jagger Rooney's First Year
Family Album: The Watts-Schreibers
Family Album: The Richie-Maddens
March 27th, 2008 at 10:57 am
Where is her bump?!? I’m due in early July (granted, it’s my 7th baby) but I definitely look pregnant! She doesn’t even appear to be 2 or 3 months along to me, let alone 6. Strange…
March 27th, 2008 at 10:58 am
I think that she looks absolutely lovely. I’m glad to see her and Keith getting some R&R. Can’t wait to see her little one this summer.
March 27th, 2008 at 10:58 am
The bump is growing! She looks great.
CBB: I got deja vu when I saw this photo, even though it said it was taken today. I found the story here (http://justjared.buzznet.com/2008/03/27/nicole-kidman-marubra-beach/). It seems it was taken last Thursday. Still very current though.
Sarah’s note: I’ll correct the post. I think Angela may have just missed the bottom part of the caption at the photo agency, but its easy to fix! Thanks for letting us know.
March 27th, 2008 at 11:01 am
CBB, the pics are not from today, they are from last week, the 20th of March in Byron Bay.
March 27th, 2008 at 11:53 am
It’s actually spelled Maroubra, not Marubra
March 27th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
she’s six months?
i dont even believe it.
March 27th, 2008 at 12:12 pm
she looks great. boy, i’m sick of stories in magazines or other sites, saying that there must be something wrong with her, for being so small. everyone is different, and it’s nice that there’s always respect on this corner of the internet.
March 27th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
Finally showing some belly.
So happy for this couple.
March 27th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
Wow, Nicole is looking beautiful and I’m really glad that she is taking it easy and having a fun and happy pregnancy.
jaQ, I’m also really sick of all the stories saying there must be something wrong with her pregnancy. My cousin is 5′10 and she was six months pregnant before she even knew!
March 27th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
I think she looks right on for 5 or 6 months considering how tall she is and how long her torso is.
I’m not really a tall person myself, but I tend to carry “small” meaning my belly just doesn’t stick out as far as people seem to think it should. By the end of my pregnancies, people were telling me I looked closer to 6 or 7 months than 9, but both of my children were in the 7 pound range so they were obviously growing just fine.
March 27th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
For a woman that tall and thin I think her pregnancy belly looks “normal” so to speak. She has such a look about her these days that is so nice to see.
March 27th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
hope everything is going well.maroubra beach is in sydney, byron bay is like 5hrs north of sydney or something, fyi.
March 27th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
she’s finally starting to get a little pooch…i’m so happy for her… i remember when she and tom got divorced she was also going through a miscarriage… i’m so happy that her dream to carry a child is coming true!!!
March 27th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
are you sure the baby is due in 4 months????
she is so thin and doesn’t look 5-6months pregnant to me
March 27th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
There’s the belly. She looks great.
March 27th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
Yay, Finally! She looks pregnant! Glad to see she is taking it easy too.
March 27th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
I think it’s cute if you look close though it looks like Keith may be carrying the baby for her… they are quite a great couple!
March 27th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
My mom is 6′1 and never showed until she was much further along also. Everyone is different.
March 27th, 2008 at 3:18 pm
she looks awesome she must eat really healthy when i was preggers all i craved was salad and fruits and veggies. i was so good i didn’t even have soda or coffee or any of that and i put the weight on at the end my stomach finally popped out at about 6-7 months. my son weighed 7 lbs even and is thriving now at 5 i just remember craving all the good stuff i put on 26 lbs and it was all gone in two wks. i was very lucky and smart about it =)
March 27th, 2008 at 3:34 pm
They both look so relaxed!! Nicole certainly deserves this time off for a happy pregnancy and birth!
March 27th, 2008 at 4:12 pm
is it normal for her to be due in july and carrying that small? i was just wondering…
March 27th, 2008 at 6:22 pm
awww look at the little baby belly! I’m really happy for them!
March 27th, 2008 at 6:33 pm
Aww I think maybe Keith is getting a sympathy belly to go with Nicoles.
Ha, ha, I love it!
March 27th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
I am 5′8 and have a long torso. I was due at the end of January and didn’t really start showing where strangers could notice until October.
I think she looks great and I am so happy for them!
March 28th, 2008 at 6:59 am
Are you sure it’s Maroubra Beach? Maroubra Beach has lots of cliffs and no dunes covered in shrubs like in the background of those photos (unless they were waaay down the south end of the beach where I’m not sure it’s even classified as Maroubra). We spend most of our time at the end with the pool, so it’s possible that I’m wrong, but here’s a picture of Maroubra Beach (through a google images search):
http://www.britangie.34sp.com/images1/gallery/MaroubraBeach.jpg
And another angle, showing the cliffs and lack of shrub covered dunes:
http://atdw.visitnsw.com.au/multimedia/tnsw/048401.jpg
Shannon’s note: I live on the north shore and I doubted whether it was Maroubra too. I thought it might have been Coogee or Tamarama. They spend a lot of time in Bondi though and Maroubra is just around the corner.