Comments on: Introducing Matilda Kewell http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/05/11/matilda-kewell/ Celebrating the lifestyle of Hollywood's newest moms and littlest stars. Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:19:05 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Ruthella http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/05/11/matilda-kewell/#comment-57462 Ruthella Sun, 11 May 2008 23:29:55 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/matilda-kewell#comment-57462 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>My third took the longest too (although still quick), and I was assuming it would be the quickest! It was the only time my waters broke, so maybe that slowed things down...</p> <p>The second time I was only in hospital 20 mins before he was born! So I know what Sheree's getting at.</p> <p>They are a beautiful family :)</p></div>

My third took the longest too (although still quick), and I was assuming it would be the quickest! It was the only time my waters broke, so maybe that slowed things down…

The second time I was only in hospital 20 mins before he was born! So I know what Sheree’s getting at.

They are a beautiful family :)

]]> By: merrymum http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/05/11/matilda-kewell/#comment-57465 merrymum Sun, 11 May 2008 18:05:21 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/matilda-kewell#comment-57465 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>8am to 3am is 19 hours, not 7 hours, so it was a LONG time for a third baby, poor thing! I feel blessed to have had 2 extremely quick labours (2.5 and 1.5 hours) Yippee!</p> </div>

8am to 3am is 19 hours, not 7 hours, so it was a LONG time for a third baby, poor thing! I feel blessed to have had 2 extremely quick labours (2.5 and 1.5 hours) Yippee!

]]> By: kelly http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/05/11/matilda-kewell/#comment-57469 kelly Sun, 11 May 2008 17:29:32 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/matilda-kewell#comment-57469 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>A bit odd that she thought 7 hours was a long time to be in labour, most labours are longer than that but I suppose she just means it was long considering it was a third baby. And what a luxury to be induced on her terms, I had 4 days of contractions before they eventually broke my waters!</p> </div>

A bit odd that she thought 7 hours was a long time to be in labour, most labours are longer than that but I suppose she just means it was long considering it was a third baby. And what a luxury to be induced on her terms, I had 4 days of contractions before they eventually broke my waters!

]]>