I don’t have a problem with people having kids when they are not married. I’m just saying that for a practicing Catholic that’s not what you’d call kosher.

sanja- They DO plan to get married. They have simply decided to waited until after they have all of their children (and I am with the majority who thinks it’s probably because Charlotte doesn’t want to be pregnant or breastfeeding while planning a wedding, or to be a pregnant bride. The fact of the matter is, most weddings take about a year to plan, and if Charlotte really DOES want six kids before she’s 30, she’ll more than likely have them very close together).

“Our priests sometimes refuse to christen babies (if both parents are Catholic) and not married.”

Wow! Isn’t christening a pretty big deal? Why punish a child b/c of what their parents are or arent’ doing?
(Not trying to be snarky… genuinely curious!)

Gavin is a rugby player who plays internationally for Wales and Charlotte was/is a classical/pop singer who now hosts a very funny chat show.

My husband and I have arrived separately at events. No big deal.

Fay, Charlotte is more famous than her boyfriend! She is a classical singer who crossed over to pop etc in her late teens. She’s been famous since she was 11. She is said to have the “voice of an angel.” She’s an amazing singer.

not to sound stupid, but why are these people famous… okay well the football player i get, but who is Charlotte Church, and if it’s just that she has a t.v. show, how does a 22 year old get her own t.v. show? seems as though she’d have to DO something, eh?

Are they both Catholic or just one of them?
If they are religious, I really don’t get why they have a child christened and another on the way and don’t plan to get married. To a practising Catholic that would be a big deal. Seems a bit hypocritical to me. Our priests sometimes refuse to christen babies (if both parents are Catholic) and not married.

Lola, I see where you’re coming from, but with magazine deals, that’s generally not true. The newspapers like to break the secrecy because if they are the ones to break the exclusive pictures, they will sell newspapers. So having a magazine deal with either not change the level of interest, or sometimes increse it, it won’t usually bring it down. And yes, before anyone asks, I have worked in the industry so I know a little of what I’m talking about!

Phoebe, if they have a magazine deal for the pictures they’re less likely to get papparazzi at the church trying to get a shot. Controlling who can get particular photos is probably the best way to protect Ruby from being scared by photographers.

Ash, they aren’t really that huge in Wales. They have fans, but it’s not on the level of the Beckhams or anything like that. As you can see from the picture that CBB have used on this article, Charlotte can walk along the street and not be approached by anyone. Other than protecting the magazine deal, I don’t see why they would need that many security people, the couple and Ruby just don’t get the kind of attention that would need something like that. They probably consider themselves lucky! The likelihood is that if they do in fact have a magazine deal, the magazine ordered the security to ensure the pictures were exclusive. I’m not criticising the family for taking this approach at all, I think it’s probably the best way to control any potential interest.