Comments on: Naomi Watts and Liev Schreiber expecting second child http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5/ Celebrating the lifestyle of Hollywood's newest moms and littlest stars. Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:11:28 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Casey http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5/#comment-42855 Casey Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:37:54 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5#comment-42855 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I'm so happy for them, there are so many pregnant celebrities right now! </p> <p>Check out my new site: http://www.celebritybaby-buzz.com</p></div>

I’m so happy for them, there are so many pregnant celebrities right now!

Check out my new site: http://www.celebritybaby-buzz.com

]]> By: CelebBabyLover http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5/#comment-42859 CelebBabyLover Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:46:30 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5#comment-42859 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Considering the source is US Weekly, I'm guessing this rumor is true. I have found that, when something appears in US Weekly, it turns out to be true about 9 times out of 10. While People is the celebrity-based magazine I trust the most, I trust US Weekly the second most. I'd even venture to say that US Weekly is usually about 95 percent accurate.</p> <p>The only celebs they've printed false rumors about quite a bit are the Jolie-Pitts and and the Holmes-Cruises (although lately they have been very accurate about the J-Ps). Unlike other magazines, however, they don't just make up those rumors (at least as far as I know). When a rumor they print turns out to be false, it's because the source they used gave them incorrect information, or because they forgot to check their facts throughly.</p></div>

Considering the source is US Weekly, I’m guessing this rumor is true. I have found that, when something appears in US Weekly, it turns out to be true about 9 times out of 10. While People is the celebrity-based magazine I trust the most, I trust US Weekly the second most. I’d even venture to say that US Weekly is usually about 95 percent accurate.

The only celebs they’ve printed false rumors about quite a bit are the Jolie-Pitts and and the Holmes-Cruises (although lately they have been very accurate about the J-Ps). Unlike other magazines, however, they don’t just make up those rumors (at least as far as I know). When a rumor they print turns out to be false, it’s because the source they used gave them incorrect information, or because they forgot to check their facts throughly.

]]> By: Alex http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5/#comment-42863 Alex Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:57:16 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5#comment-42863 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>OMG IM SOOOO HAPPY FOR THEM! YAY!</p> </div>

OMG IM SOOOO HAPPY FOR THEM! YAY!

]]> By: amelie http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5/#comment-42874 amelie Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:29:03 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5#comment-42874 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This photo means the 'rumor' part of this announcement can be deleted:</p> <p>http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23964659-5012974,00.html</p> <p>She looks closer to 6 months to me.</p></div>

This photo means the ‘rumor’ part of this announcement can be deleted:

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23964659-5012974,00.html

She looks closer to 6 months to me.

]]> By: Steph http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5/#comment-42879 Steph Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:12:11 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5#comment-42879 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Irish twins! Yeah for them!</p> <p>I agree it should be news when THEY say it is, some people like to wait until they know everything is ok with the pregnancy and baby.</p> <p>They DO make beautiful babies, though</p></div>

Irish twins! Yeah for them!

I agree it should be news when THEY say it is, some people like to wait until they know everything is ok with the pregnancy and baby.

They DO make beautiful babies, though

]]> By: Karen http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5/#comment-42884 Karen Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:41:22 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5#comment-42884 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Kelli, the baby years are the easy ones with close in age kids. Mine are 19 months and now 13, and 11 1/2. I also have a 6 year old. I look back and think it was tough but that was easy compared to this age, they are busy and with school and such. I think it was easier with 2 in diapers. Don't worry:)</p> </div>

Kelli, the baby years are the easy ones with close in age kids. Mine are 19 months and now 13, and 11 1/2. I also have a 6 year old. I look back and think it was tough but that was easy compared to this age, they are busy and with school and such. I think it was easier with 2 in diapers. Don’t worry:)

]]> By: say1031 http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5/#comment-42889 say1031 Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:48:07 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5#comment-42889 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Kelli, </p> <p>Alexander's birthday is July 25th. </p></div>

Kelli,

Alexander’s birthday is July 25th.

]]> By: emily http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5/#comment-42893 emily Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:25:23 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5#comment-42893 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>How exciting! I love herI'm hoping to have back-to-back babies as well. :)</p> </div>

How exciting! I love herI’m hoping to have back-to-back babies as well. :)

]]> By: Lauren http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5/#comment-42897 Lauren Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:32:19 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5#comment-42897 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>"Didn't she say in an interview after Sasha was born that she wanted to have another one soon? Or am I thinking of someone else?"</p> <p>You've got the right actress. Naomi has said she'd have quite a few kids if she can, but knows that because of her age the number of kids she can still have is limited. I believe she last said she planned to try for three and would be trying as soon as possible. Obviously she was successful!<br /> </p></div>

“Didn’t she say in an interview after Sasha was born that she wanted to have another one soon? Or am I thinking of someone else?”

You’ve got the right actress. Naomi has said she’d have quite a few kids if she can, but knows that because of her age the number of kids she can still have is limited. I believe she last said she planned to try for three and would be trying as soon as possible. Obviously she was successful!

]]> By: Stephany http://celebrity-babies.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5/#comment-42901 Stephany Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:52:30 +0000 http://peoplecbb.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/naomi-watts-lie-5#comment-42901 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Wow, surprising but exciting! My eyes grew wide when I read the title and then I said, "Yayyy!" Sasha is a beautiful little boy and Naomi and Liev seem like great, low-key parents.</p> <p>Congrats - hope it's true!</p></div>

Wow, surprising but exciting! My eyes grew wide when I read the title and then I said, “Yayyy!” Sasha is a beautiful little boy and Naomi and Liev seem like great, low-key parents.

Congrats – hope it’s true!

]]>