Sign up to get cute photos, exclusive giveaways, special offers and more!
Sign Up"Let’s see, pretty sure I wouldn’t mind setting up my daughter with him in advance. Hmm, how can I make this work!?"
- Gretchen, on Donald and Barron Trump Suit Up"I wanted to look right when Walker came out. All of a sudden it was like my inner gangster came out. I was like, 'Yeah baby, you did that thing, that's what I'm talkin' about, that's my boy!'"
- Taye Diggs, on Taye Diggs on Childbirth: ‘It Was Crazy’These links are worth a click:
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the site staff has approved them.
The following types of comments will not be posted:
We are cautious about discussions on volatile topics such as abortion, religion, politics and race.
If you have questions, concerns, or breaking news to share, please contact us at CBBTips@gmail.com rather than posting a comment.
Feel free to agree or disagree with each other as long as you do it respectfully, remembering that we all have our own experiences and perspectives. Keep in mind that there are people on the other end reading what you write.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.
Star-Worthy Holiday Looks for Kids!
Family Album: The Simpson-Wentzes
Great Green Gifts for Moms and Kids
Family Album: The Alba-Warrens
Adorable Stocking Stuffers Under $30
November 3rd, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Very moving letter by Sandra. Good luck to them.
November 3rd, 2009 at 2:39 pm
I read that article on society and children and after read the commentary made in Jezebel.I was very surprised by the logic behind it.I think society is obsessed with children.If we look around,so many new products and services are aimed to children and mothers;in a way I at least had not seen in previous years.Children are the target demographic for everything this days.Everything must be child-friendly or otherwise people will freak out.I’ve also seen how childfree people are some sort of social outcasts for most.The stereotype of them is a shallow and materialistic being who has no place in the community.Interesting article,but flawed argument in my opinion.
November 3rd, 2009 at 3:15 pm
Sandra Bullock thing….seems like a lot of he said/she said to me, doesn’t seem to be a clear winner or loser in that, which is sad, because in situations like that, it’s always the child that ends up losing out. So good luck Sunny, since she’s the one who needs the prayers right now.
November 3rd, 2009 at 3:25 pm
I agree Alex.Hopefully everyone involved can be civil and remember that it’s not about them even in the middle of a custody battle for the sake of their daughter.
November 3rd, 2009 at 4:22 pm
With regards to Sandra Bullock/Jesse James…It appears that Sunny’s bio mom has issues that she really needs to deal with first and foremost…the best thing she could do for her daughter is let her father and his wife continue raising her in a suitable/safe enviroment in which she can thrive and excell…When she gets her act together, then perhaps she would have better standing against a judge…Kudos to Sandra for stepping up to the plate and taking on a huge responsibility…so grounded and level headed…putting the needs of a child above all else…I too, am a stepmom (hate that term) who raises my husband’s two sons as my own and would do anything for…Children need stability and it appears as though Jesse and Sandra can provide a much better environment for her…and I am sure there is plenty of LOVE in that household which she would benefit tremendously from rather than be in a home where her mother is in some drug induced fog/haze while her young daughter pretty much is “raising” herself…just not safe…Best of luck to The James’ on their continued quest for custody of Sunny.
November 3rd, 2009 at 6:25 pm
Pfft I had to laugh at society “hating” children. As Eve said, children are sacred now more than ever! Not that it’s always a bad thing. But that guy whining about people being annoyed at his kid being on a plane is proof of it, he expects everything to be child-friendly and everyone to be tolerant of his toddler ruining their day. How hard is it to wait till your child is old enough to travel long distances? (special circumstances aside, obviously)
November 3rd, 2009 at 6:57 pm
Given that Sandra and Jesse are successfully co-parenting his older children and have a good relationship with their mother, I’m led to think most problems stem from Janine. At this time, it doesn’t seem like she can provide her daughter with the care and stability that she needs. If that is the case, it would be best for her to get help while her daughter remains in the care of her father and stepmother. Once she does so, I hope both sides are amicable and can create a system of shared custody that benefits Sunny.
November 3rd, 2009 at 7:08 pm
I agree with you Alice.
November 4th, 2009 at 8:44 am
@ Alice – EXCUSE ME????? We should wait until our child is old enough to travel long distances????? So my mother shouldn’t get to see her grandchild just because I don’t live near her???? So my husband and I should have missed my sister-in-law’s wedding because we have a child???? That statement is just ridiculous. I am not a person who thinks that everything should be child-friendly – not by a long shot. But a plane is one place that people have to share – with everyone. Sorry, but that’s just the way it. People who say things like what you just said, make me FURIOUS!!!!!
November 4th, 2009 at 9:17 am
Stormdan, Alice did actually say “special circumstances aside”. I think your mother getting to meet her grandchild and going to your sister-in-law’s wedding count as special circumstances. I took Alice’s comment to mean people should avoid unecessary long distance travel with babies (holidays, business trips etc.).
November 4th, 2009 at 1:47 pm
Yes Rachel-Jane, that’s what I meant! No need to be furious stormdan, although maybe your mother could travel to her grandchild instead of the other way around for the first years of the baby’s life, or you could drive etc. Don’t act like putting a baby on a plane is the only way to go either. But ayway if people only flew their little kids for family weddings, the skies would be a better place indeed.
November 4th, 2009 at 3:02 pm
Well Alice, Stella, and Rachel-Jane, next time a child is annoying you on a plane, since you have no way of knowing what’s happening in a stranger’s life, assume that they are traveling for “special circumstances”, and cut the parents some slack.
November 4th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
I think this is what the author of that article was trying to say, why should a child not be allowed to travel because it might bother other people on the plane? They are people too and their parents paid just as much as the next person for that plane ticket. There are plenty of people on airplanes that do annoying things that bother other passengers, but we cannot kick them off. It would be nice if everyone tried to show compassion for others, it is always a hassle to travel, but everyone just wants to make it as easy as possible and get to their destination!
November 4th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
Well if you read everything in the article, he was just complaining of getting glares from other people. And in the story he was referring to where a child did get kicked out of a plane, it was because he was screaming and preventing passengers from hearing the safety announcement, which is pretty important. If you’re potentially putting other passengers in danger, child or not you shouldn’t be allowed on the plane. I’m pretty sure that if some random person started screaming/putting music very loudly or something similar on a plane, they would get glares, remarks and possibly sanctions from the airline. The compassion should go both ways… for one child in the plane there’s a hundred other people that would love a bit of compassion too.
But anyway, no one said children should be forbidden on planes. Just that parents should not travel unnecessarily with very young children unless they are able to discipline them if needed and keep them behaved and/or busy. It’s just terrible for everyone, parent and child included.
I do think the airlines will end up offering child-free flights, maybe at an extra cost. That would make everyone happy.
November 4th, 2009 at 6:54 pm
Well, I did read the whole article and I agree with the author. I do think that our general society thinks of children as a nuisance. I was not on that plane but I cannot imagine that child was so bad he deserved to be kicked off. There is always so much commotion before takeoff, I hardly ever hear the safety precautions anyway, and truthfully does anyone really pay attention to them?
I guess the responses here affected me, because I just flew to Maui with my one year old and am planning to fly to LA this month too, and both are for family vacations, not necessary travel. My daughter happened to do great on the plane rides, but I am sure that will not always be the case!
But you are right Alice, that would probably be a great way for the airlines to make some extra money by offering child-free flights, so people don’t have to be inconvenienced by a child crying. It is not ideal to travel with a child but I am not going to let our family miss out on fun vacations because someone does not want to be on a plane with her if she happens to get upset while traveling.
November 5th, 2009 at 8:50 am
I agree with everyone here, Janine does have some issues, mostly of her not making the best decisions when it comes to her baby. Marrying a man you met in prison and bringing him to your home, not knowing if he has a history of violence, spooks me. There has been too many stories of bad men hurting their partner’s kids. Janine also going to jail for tax evasion was tells me, she lacks good judgment. Tough decisions here, but I don’t see Janine providing a safe environment right now.
November 5th, 2009 at 10:19 am
Okay, Lillie, I’d just like to point out that I didn’t say I necessarily agreed with what Alice said (although I do a bit), all I was saying was I thought stormdan had misinterpreted Alice’s comment. No need to jump down my throat about that.